🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.